College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Athletic Department cuts football program

News Staff

Published: Sunday, November 22, 2009

Updated: Monday, November 23, 2009 21:11

CLICK HERE to read an open letter from Athletics Director Peter Roby

Northeastern officials announced yesterday the decision to terminate school's intercollegiate football program, according to a press release from the university.

According to the release, the decision was made by a panel consisting of senior administrators, trustees, faculty, alumni, donors and students. The Athletics Review Panel has met since 2007 to discuss the direction of the Athletic Department. Peter Roby, director of athletics and recreation, headed this panel and made the initial recommendation to discontinue football, which the panel accepted.

In the release, Roby said the benchmark for defining a program’s success is not wins and losses, but creating a positive student-athlete experience.

“The primary motivation for this decision was based on the significant obstacles to providing this experience for our football players,” Roby said in the press release.

The release addressed the financial burdens of continuing to field a team, in part by saying that “elevating and sustaining a competitive Division 1 football program would require additional multimillion dollar investments on an ongoing basis.”

Mike Armini, vice president for marketing and communications, told The News a press conference to discuss the matter in detail will be held Monday morning at Matthews Arena at 11 a.m.

In an interview with The News from October 2007, Roby said cutting an athletic program was “a possibility,” citing the mandate from President Joseph Aoun for each department "to try and be distinctive and excellent."

According to the release, the decision follows the university’s attempt to “prioritize programs and invest in signature strengths.”

The decision to drop football comes less than a year after the Friends of Northeastern Athletics group wrote in a newsletter that football would not be dropped. In a Dec. 21, 2008 newsletter, the group wrote it met with Roby about future plans for the university's athletics programs. According to the newsletter, Roby reportedly remarked that there was no reason Northeastern football would not exist for the next four years.

The football team had not had a winning season since 2003. It completed its 74th season of play Saturday with a 33-27 victory at Rhode Island, finishing up the 2009 season with a record of 3-8, 3-5 in the Colonial Athletic Association. Armini said members of the football team who had been receiving an athletic scholarship will still continue to receive their scholarship until their graduation. As an NCAA Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) school, Northeastern's football team received 63 scholarships a year.

The departure of the football program leaves the school with 18 intercollegiate sports, in addition to club and intramural sports.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

90 comments

Matthew D. Soleyn
Tue Nov 24 2009 23:10
The stadium fee was never abolished, but rather restructured into a MANDATORY Campus Recreation Fee to create the "multi purpose on-campus athletic facility." Since 2004, that MANDATORY fee has had money put away to go towards an on-campus stadium. Like Mr. Brielman, I have paid into the stadium and want to see one. Whether or not football ever plays in it, we as students deserve a stadium.

Football was turning a profit, and Northeastern could have brought football back to glory with investment into a stadium. The recession clearly had an impact. To bring football back to glory, you'd have to invest in a stadium. Northeastern had to back off an investment in an academic/residence/office building [Building K - was to be built where Cullinane Hall was to open in Fall 2011] because of the recession. That means that a stadium wasn't going to happen for the next few years because the University would never want to have an image of putting athletics above academic space.

Here's a Theory
Tue Nov 24 2009 22:32
Contrary to what we have been told, the issue is in fact Title IX. Other than at major college conferences - SEC, ACC, Big Ten, etc. even the Big Four sports at most schools run cashflow negative. Anyone think that gate receipts for WPI or Tufts football covers their operating costs? The fact is that in the major college conferences, football covers itself plus non-revenue sports (male and female swimming, gymnastics etc.). What if NU were about to get slapped for being out of compliance with Title IX? What if NU had to come up with 65 new scholarships for women's sports? Sorry ladies but other than the likes of UConn Basketball, women's sports teams run cashflow negative. Who would cover that cost? Solution? Eliminate the football team thereby eliminating the Title IX issue (and the associated cost of 65 women's scholarships). Just a theory of course.
Your name
Tue Nov 24 2009 22:10
roby has no idea what hes talking about. UNH plays in a stadium as bad as parsons. UNH is in the playoffs every year. its all hager, he killed the program. I hope he never works in football again.
Your name
Tue Nov 24 2009 22:10
roby has no idea what hes talking about. UNH plays in a stadium as bad as parsons. UNH is in the playoffs every year. its all hager, he killed the program. I hope he never works in football again.
Low Attendance at NU?
Tue Nov 24 2009 22:00
Someone should conduct a survey to see how many Harvard students have been to a Harvard basketball game....
NU 84
Tue Nov 24 2009 21:46
When I was a student NU billed students a fee of $25 per semester to help to pay for a future football stadium that was to be built on the roof of the Cabot Gym..... Anyway - we had no say in this. The fee was mandatory. My understanding is that this type of fee still existed until very recently. There is no stadium. I have no beef with the football team. They should have had their stadium. I think I speak for most graduates when I say I want my money back. I think a Class Action suit that represents every graduate for the last 30 years is in order. That should give the administration something to think about. How much is $500 plus 25 years of interest? Anyone know a lawyer?
nu alum 05'
Tue Nov 24 2009 18:51
Its called get a new coach. I came here to play for Coach Brown. I knew parsons was a dump but I loved the coach, his philosophy and knew that I would be getting a 50k scholarship to attend a great school in Boston. a new coach would have solved this problem. Picture this I didnt pay rent for 5 years, didnt pay for one meal anywhere on campus in 5 years, paid for no books, got free healthcare and 500 bucks pellgrant money a semester to do whatever I wanted. dont tell me you need a new stadium to lure recruits, how many kids are turning that down if they like the coach?
Your name
Tue Nov 24 2009 16:47
The cut isnt about profitability; football wasn't given the proper resources to be successful, i.e. stadium on campus, quality staff, FANS, etc... I think it became apparent to Roby that the school, alumni, and students were not about to offer that to the football program any time soon, and that, combined with the lack of support for the team, led to the decision.
I've been here for four years and heard way more criticism of our team than praise. There's plenty of support for these kids on this blog, but where was it before the team got cut? Hell, only 30 people showed up to protest, thats barely half of the team. Cutting the program was best for this school and probably best for the kids who still have eligibility left. It's still November and they have the opportunity to find another place to play, one where the football team is given more respect than it had at Northeastern.
hahahahah
Tue Nov 24 2009 15:18
They can only blame themselves....if they didnt suck and could win and look like a half ass decent team the program would still be here. But the fact of the matter is that the little giants could probably run over this team.

HA everyone say hi to the "wicked cool" football players when you see them. GO TEAM!

Christopher Brielman
Tue Nov 24 2009 15:08
Another fan of the cut: Few are disputing that most sports programs are not profitable. However, the Wall Street Journal says that, at least this year, our football team *was* profitable. Forgive me for believing the Wall Street Journal, one of the most reliable sources of financial information in the modern era, but I'm going to have to take their word over yours.
Another fan of the cut
Tue Nov 24 2009 12:14
John (et al), check your facts. Less than 1% of all athetlic departments actually make money (sure the football team might make money but there are other sports that need to be supported). It's the biggest myth in the business (and it is a business) that schools actually make money with their sports programs. Sure football might make a few bucks for the school but when was the last time the track team brought in any coin to support their program. Even the hockey team is a 'run in the red' operation. Take it from someone who knows, the cost to operate a Division I sports program is a lot more than what you would think it is. The lack of edcuation on this subject matter is rather startling as it pertains to the comments that people are make. Read a book, do some research before you think you have something worth saying.
John
Tue Nov 24 2009 10:27
If what this guy says about the Wall Street Journal is true, and it probably is as the Wall Street Journal rarely is wrong, then Northeastern has some explaining to do as to why they claim they are saving money by cutting a proftitable sports program.
former nu player
Tue Nov 24 2009 10:17
christopher, they played Boston College this season and recieved a check for I think 300-400k. They didnt play any teams in the south this season only traveled to one game which was Nova. It would be very possible to turn a profit. hager is lowest paid coach in the CAA and the staff is also the lowest paid.
Stegosaurus
Tue Nov 24 2009 10:07
ROOAAARRRR
Uncle Rico
Tue Nov 24 2009 09:50
Man, if Hager had put me in during the 4th quarter, Roby wouldn't have cut the program...no doubt, no doubt in my mind.
Tupac
Tue Nov 24 2009 09:50
Life goes on
OJ Simpson
Tue Nov 24 2009 09:45
Hey man, I did great after football.
Keith Lavon
Tue Nov 24 2009 09:26
The line for applications at Chicken Lou's is out the door!
Paws
Tue Nov 24 2009 09:25
From me and all my fellow students: GOOD RIDDANCE.
NUtrackster82
Tue Nov 24 2009 09:13
I'd be interested in knowing what NU intends to do with the "stadium fee" it collected from students. Am I understanding that issue correctly? They collected the fee per semester for how many years? How much was collected? What happens to it now?

If the fee was collected for a specific reason but not used as intended, does NU have a problem under existing MA consumer laws? What will the Commonwealth's Attorney General do? How will Martha Coakley approach this? Will she enforce the bait and switch provisions, or will she punt?

Start calling her, people. Seems to me that something was misrepresented here, but I am interested in what exactly this "stadium fee" was intended for and whether NU intends to take the totals collected (anyone know how much was collected from students?) and apply them to something other than general budgetary items.







log out