College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Trays to be limited in new residence hall

By Maggie Cassidy

News Staff

|

Published: Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Call them the little trays that could.
Despite a formal recommendation to the administration from Student Government Association (SGA) to keep the new International Village trayless, some trays will be available when its dining hall opens this fall, SGA announced in a press release yesterday.
According to the release, the university “has agreed to purchase trays, although in a lesser amount than originally planned” in order to “accommodate those wishing to remove trays from their dining experience.”
SGA President Ryan Fox said he was not sure how many trays will be purchased, but said he believed the number would be related to to the survey responses.
SGA made its recommendation to the administration after conducting an online Food Preferences survey in April. More than 65 percent of students who completed the survey supported going trayless, but critics said the question was biased because it listed only the benefits of removing trays.
Fox, who supported keeping International Village trayless, said he was happy with the compromise.
“I think that it was able to work out really well,” he said. “Initially we were told we would be able to make it trayless-friendly or purchase trays; initially it was not an option to do both. So I think it worked out really well that we could provide both options to students.”
However, Resident Student Association (RSA) Vice President for Housing Services Matt Soleyn, a vocal supporter of keeping trays, said although he was happy that the decision would allow “a student decide for themselves if they want to use a tray or not,” he felt making less trays available might cause more problems.
“The one concern that comes up in my mind is that if you have less trays than usual and you’re not able to meet the demand ... students might get upset,” he said.
In addition to International Village maintaining a number of trays lesser than other campus dining halls, “the Business Office has agreed to replace all open rails in International Village with flat surfaces, particularly at the dish return,” according to the release.
Fox said SGA also plans to educate students about tray usage. He said education will mostly take part in the dining halls themselves by demonstrating the positives and negatives of using trays “in the moment [when a student is considering] picking up a tray.”
“It’s something that we will continue to look at,” he said. “We may explore other possibilities, like trayless days, as more of an educational tool instead of a removing of a service.”
Despite support in April’s survey for going trayless, some students, like Jose Orozco, said they were happy trays would be available in International Village.
“I think it’s good to keep them,” said Orozco, a junior mechanical engineering major. “I use the trays and I think they’re helpful because a lot of times when they give us the plates they’re really hot, and to go from one side to the other side [of the dining hall] you really do need that tray.”
But others, like Nancy Menapace, also a junior mechanical engineering major, said she disagreed with the university’s decision.
“I think it’s good that [SGA is] educating students but I’m of the opinion they just shouldn’t have trays,” she said. “I agree with the point that you use water to wash them and also you’re more apt to take more food and it creates waste. … I think we should do anything we can do to try and help ourselves be green, and also it seems a little ludicrous to me that anyone would really care enough to push back on the right to a tray.”


 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

21 comments

Tracially Insensitive
Sat Jul 11 2009 18:53
You're all traycists.
Your name
Thu Jul 9 2009 01:04
"Yet again one of the most useless student groups that no one but themselves care about is messing stuff up."

Sums up RSA perfectly.

SGA Alum
Thu Jul 2 2009 14:59
SGA is on the front page of the Huntington News and it's about... CAFETERIA TRAYS?

The potential of the organization is limitless - if it's done right. But THIS is why the general student body doesn't take it seriously. What about Academic Advising? Coop Advising? Affordable international opportunities? Practice space for club/intramural sports? Improved services at the heath center? Better support for student organizations?

These are all initiatives that have been worked on - where is the publicity? Why doesn't the News write about these? And why doesn't SGA do a better job of getting the word out there?

Wise Alumni
Thu Jul 2 2009 11:44
lunch trays... you're arguing about lunch trays... why don't you put your resources towards something a little more productive? I don't know, how about you take the wasted time and effort and concentrate on something beneficial to students in terms of spending on academic improvements, upgrading classrooms in older buildings, getting rid of "facilities" fees that are tacked onto tuition which is already through the roof. For the love of God there is more to life than lunch trays...
Matthew D. Soleyn
Thu Jul 2 2009 09:07
You don't need much of an education to tell that the original survey that SGA did was bias. Middle school pre-teens could have told you that and been correct. It doesn't matter who issued the survey. If RSA had done a bias survey and then said take away trays or not have trays, my hope is that some other organization would keep us in check and stop us from pulling a fast one on the student body.

SGA President Fox's claim that initially the option of having trays and making the dining hall trayless-friendly did not exist is a blatant false statement. Not good for week #1 on the job to start off by lying to your constituents. Take a look at Stetson West next Monday when it is open for orientation: it's trayless-friendly with the conveyor belt-style dish return, yet there are still trays there and you have the choice to take a tray or not take a tray.

Your name
Wed Jul 1 2009 19:00
"RSA didn't sit on the sidelines", So... you and your band of fools did this just to contradict SGA? Is this "bad data" bad for any reason other than the fact that you didn't collect it? Yet again one of the most useless student groups that no one but themselves care about is messing stuff up.
RSA Member
Wed Jul 1 2009 18:26
Soleyn is an idiot. After all the talking he did about his stupid survey, I never saw any action taken. This is typical Soleyn for you-always willing to whine, but never willing to do any work. He's got a big mouth for such a lazy person.
Baffled in Brookline
Wed Jul 1 2009 15:39
oh great, they'll eliminate trays so that when you get your lunch while you're cayrrying several of
your steamng hot plates to the table, someone will steal the otehr platers you paid for.

I love having stuff i paid for stolen.

Your name
Wed Jul 1 2009 15:29
“Initially we were told we would be able to make it trayless-friendly or purchase trays; initially it was not an option to do both. So I think it worked out really well that we could provide both options to students.”

This had nothing to do with RSA. RSA just sat along and whined while SGA worked with the administration to secure the necessary extra funds.

CJ '11
Wed Jul 1 2009 15:19
Soleyn's RSA actually was on the right side of this, give credit where credits due. Dude, youre sometimes a jackass but now I feel like I should have voted for you.
Your name
Wed Jul 1 2009 13:18
Where's that survey RSA was going to do?
Matthew D. Soleyn
Wed Jul 1 2009 13:15
Part of the reason this compromise was reached is because RSA didn't sit on the sidelines, but protected the interest of students who live in the residence halls or use facilities in the residence halls. We didn't sit back and accept the recommendation made by then SGA VP Fox based on bad data. What we DID do was fight for the students.
Matthew D. Soleyn
Wed Jul 1 2009 13:13
You have a dining hall that seats 450. If 65% don't want trays, that means you need 158 trays. But, what if in practice more people want trays? How about the trays that are being washed and not available? If you have 158 trays available, and then at the same time you get 159 people wanting to use a tray, that is one dissatisifed customer who can't get a tray or has to wait and that is a problem.
cpatel
Wed Jul 1 2009 10:28
No, its not. Deal with it :-P
Your name
Wed Jul 1 2009 10:27
to first poster...I hope you are not an English major--

"I hope your not a math major Soleyn. " It's "you're" not "your"

just saying....

Your name
Wed Jul 1 2009 10:11
cpatel, it will be over when you decide to stop talking, which isn't likely.
cpatel
Wed Jul 1 2009 09:56
Its over! Yay finally its over!
AlumniGuy
Wed Jul 1 2009 09:11
Some students really need to get out of the dorms and get a hobby or professors aren't giving them enough work to do; if they are worrying about whether to have trays in the cafeteria or not. Woah!
Darren C.
Wed Jul 1 2009 08:51
I am also glad that such a compromise could be made. I think the university did a good job in realizing that students still wanted the choice of taking a tray. If it comes up that there are not enough trays for those who want them, then more can be ordered in an appropriate manner. Good job NU
Your name
Wed Jul 1 2009 08:17
Great to see a compromise like this could be made. Tip of the hat to SGA for handling this while RSA sat on the sidelines saying whatever sounded good at the time.






log out